This website uses cookies to give you a better experience. For more information on why we use cookies, please read our cookie policy
Accept cookies
Skip to main content
Hastings Online logo
A-Z
Home | Help | Privacy | Login to My Hastings | Sign in / Register | Jobs Email alerts Hastings council Instagram Hastings council twitter feed Hastings council facebook page
  • My council
  • Freedom of Information
  • Requests and responses by date
    • FOI request (FOIR-795174729)

      Corporate Anti-Fraud Investigations

      Requested Thu 05 February 2026
      Responded Fri 27 February 2026

       

      Please provide the following information in relation to investigations undertaken by your Corporate Anti-Fraud Team (CAFT) or equivalent function.

       

      Unless otherwise stated, please provide the information broken down by financial year (2022/23, 2023/24, 2024/25), and in aggregated form only. I do not require the creation of new datasets or narrative explanation beyond information already held in recorded form.

       

      1. Volume of investigations

       

      For each financial year, the total number of Corporate Anti-Fraud investigations commenced.

       

      2. Subject type, outcome and challenge (combined)

       

      For investigations concluded in each financial year, please provide a breakdown by subject category as recorded, by outcome, and by whether the investigation was subsequently challenged or reviewed, using the Council’s recorded terms.

       

      2.1 Subject categories may include (but are not limited to):

       

      Individual (private person)

       

      Council officer

       

      Elected member

       

      External organisation or company

       

      Charity, voluntary, community, or not-for-profit organisation (including informal or constituted community groups)

       

      2.2 Other (please specify category used)

       

      Outcomes may include (but are not limited to):

       

      No further action

       

      Allegation not substantiated

       

      Allegation substantiated

       

      Partial substantiation

       

      Referral to another body

       

      Other outcome (please specify category used)

       

      2.3 Challenge status (where recorded):

       

      Not challenged

       

      Subject to internal review, appeal, or complaint

       

      Subject to external challenge (e.g. Ombudsman, court, tribunal, regulator)

       

      2.4 Where challenges occurred, please state how many resulted in:

       

      Findings upheld

       

      Findings amended

       

      Findings withdrawn or set aside

       

      If multiple subject categories apply to a single investigation, please count the investigation once under each applicable category and make this clear.

       

      3. Investigations involving external organisations

       

      For investigations involving external organisations or companies, please state how many involved entities that were:

       

      In receipt of council funding or grants

       

      In a contractual relationship with the council

       

      Operating in partnership with the council

       

      None of the above (external only)

       

      4. Procedural safeguards: right of reply and disclosure (combined)

       

      Where recorded, please state for each financial year:

       

      4.1  How many investigations concluded without the subject being given a formal right of reply prior to findings being issued.

       

      4.2 How many investigations included a formal right of reply process.

       

      4.3 How many investigation outcomes were:

       

      Shared with third parties outside the council; and/or

       

      Published or circulated publicly.

       

      4.4 Of those shared or published, how many were shared or published before the subject was given a right of reply.

       

      5. Duration of investigations

       

      For Corporate Anti-Fraud investigations commenced or concluded in each financial year, please provide the following where recorded:

       

      5.1 The shortest, longest, and average duration of investigations, measured in calendar days, from:

       

      date investigation commenced

      to

       

      date findings were issued or the investigation was formally closed.

       

      5.2 The number of investigations falling within the following duration bands:

       

      Less than 3 months

       

      3–6 months

       

      6–12 months

       

      12–18 months

       

      Over 18 months

       

      5.3 The number of investigations exceeding 12 months in duration.

       

      5.4  Where investigations exceeded 12 months, the number where your records indicate the following (counts only, no narrative required):

       

      Case complexity

       

      External dependency (e.g. bank, third party, police)

       

      Resource constraints

       

      Suspension pending other proceedings

       

      Other recorded reason (please specify category used)

       

      5.5  Where recorded, how many investigations exceeded 12 months and concluded with findings that were shared with third parties or published.

       

      6. Cost of investigations and financial recoveries

       

      For each financial year, please state where recorded:

       

      6.1 The total aggregated cost of Corporate Anti-Fraud investigations, including staff time and external costs (e.g. legal, forensic, consultancy), expressed as a total annual figure.

       

      6.2 The total financial recoveries, repayments, or income returned to the council as a result of Corporate Anti-Fraud investigations.

       

      6.3 Where recorded, whether recovered sums were:

       

      Repaid to the council’s general fund

       

      Repaid to a specific service or grant budget

       

      Recovered on behalf of an external body

       

      Aggregated figures only are sufficient.


      Response

      Thank you for your request for information regarding Corporate Anti-Fraud investigations. After careful consideration, the Council is refusing your request under the following provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA):  

      1. Section 12 – Cost of Compliance Exceeds the Appropriate Limit The Council does not operate a centralised system for recording internal fraud or misconduct investigations. Relevant information is held across multiple locations and formats within individual service areas. To answer your request, officers would need to manually locate, retrieve, and review all investigation records over several years in order to extract the detailed breakdowns you seek. The ICO’s guidance confirms that public authorities may refuse a request where the estimated cost of compliance exceeds the statutory limit, which for local authorities is £450 (18 hours of staff time at £25/hr). Our preliminary assessment shows that the work required to identify, review and extract the information significantly exceeds this limit. We are therefore refusing the request under Section 12(1).  

      2. Section 31 – Law Enforcement (Prejudice to the Prevention or Detection of Crime) The Council’s Corporate Anti-Fraud activities form part of its statutory law enforcement and crime prevention functions. Disclosure of detailed information about investigative categories, outcomes, durations, procedural safeguards, and challenge patterns would be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of fraud, by revealing operational sensitivities, investigative capacity, or areas of organisational weakness. Section 31 exempts information where disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime or the exercise of law enforcement functions. This is a qualified exemption, and we have considered the public interest. While transparency is important, we consider that the public interest in safeguarding the Council’s investigative capability and protecting the public purse outweighs the interest in disclosure.  

      3. Section 40(2) – Personal Data Given the small size of the authority, disclosure of aggregated data about subjects of investigations — particularly where categories relate to officers, elected members, or small external bodies — would risk identifying individuals. Section 40(2) exempts third party personal data where disclosure would breach the UK GDPR. We therefore cannot release any data which could reasonably lead to identification of individuals involved in, or associated with, investigations.  

      Conclusion For the reasons above, the Council is refusing the request under Sections 12, 31 and 40(2) FOIA.

  • Freedom of Information

    Contact

    Contact us if you have a question about democratic services.


    Comments

    The content on this page is the responsibility of our Democratic Services team.


    Can't find what you're looking for? Try our A - Z

A-Z of services

  • Services beginning with A
  • Services beginning with B
  • Services beginning with C
  • Services beginning with D
  • Services beginning with E
  • Services beginning with F
  • Services beginning with G
  • Services beginning with H
  • Services beginning with J
  • Services beginning with L
  • Services beginning with M
  • Services beginning with N
  • Services beginning with P
  • Services beginning with R
  • Services beginning with S
  • Services beginning with T
  • Services beginning with U
  • Services beginning with V
  • Services beginning with W
  • Hastings Museum and Art Gallery website
  • Visit 1066 Country website
  • Email alerts Hastings council Instagram Hastings council twitter feed Hastings council facebook page

Accessibility statement

Contact us

© 2026 Hastings Borough Council