FOI request (FOIR-484600428)

Parking Enforcement

Requested Tue 07 February 2023
Responded Wed 08 March 2023

I would be most grateful if you would provide me, under the Freedom of Information Act, details in respect to the contract below.

The details we require are:

1. What Parking Enforcement Contracts do you currently have in the market?

2. Suppliers who applied for inclusion on each framework/contract and were successful and not successful at the PQQ and ITT stages.

3. Actual spend on these contracts and frameworks (and any sub lots), from the start of the contract to the current date.

4. Start date and duration of framework/contract.

5. Could you please provide a copy of the service/product specification given to all bidders for when these contract was last advertised?

6. Is there an extension clause in the framework(s)/contract(s) and, if so, the duration of the extension?

7. Has a decision been made yet on whether the framework(s)/contract(s) are being either extended or renewed?

8. Who is the senior officer (outside of procurement) responsible for this contract?

Response

Hastings Borough Council only enforces off-street parking (council owned car parks).

On-street parking is dealt with by East Sussex County Council, please visit their website for further information:

https://www.eastsussex.gov.uk

NOTICE OF REFUSAL

The information you have requested regarding parking enforcement contracts is commercially sensitive and falls under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act - Commercially Sensitive Information.

Information prejudicing commercial interests - commercial interest relating to an organisations commercial activity and may include trading activity procurement and relationships with third parties.

The exemption afforded by Section 43 is subject to what is known as the 'public interest test'. When applying the test in a particular case a public authority is deciding whether the public interest is better served by non-disclosure than by disclosure.

Although the Freedom of Information Act does not define 'in the public interest', there is a presumption under Freedom of Information that openness is in the public interest. In applying the public interest test a public authority will take into account the distinction that has been often made by courts between things that are in the public interest, and things that merely interest the public. Where applicants have not identified public interest considerations succinctly or accurately, the public authority has a responsibility under the Act to make their own assessment of the public interest considerations in the particular case.

We have identified the following public interest factors that may be seen as encouraging the disclosure of information:

a) accountability of public spending

We consider these factors to be of limited relevance in relation to the information in question.

Public interest factors seen as encouraging non-disclosure are, generally, the exemptions themselves. In consideration of this matter we came to the following conclusions:

a) ensuring that companies are able to compete for business fairly

b) damage to reputation and/or financial interests

In weighing the factors for and against disclosure we have concluded that the likely benefit to the applicant and the wider public of disclosure is outweighed by the likely prejudice caused by such disclosure and that therefore the public interest is better served by non-disclosure.

For the reasons given above we will not be communicating to you the information you have requested.