-
FOI request (FOIR-141550401)
HS/All correspondence FA/19/00564 | Retention of chicken coop, shepherds hut and storage shed. | Little Warren Cottage
Requested Wed 04 September 2019
Responded Wed 23 October 2019HS/All correspondence FA/19/00564 | Retention of chicken coop, shepherds hut and storage shed. | Little Warren Cottage
This application has been withdrawn.
Please provide copies of all correspondence between HBC and the applicant/applicant agents for this application (FA/19/00564 ).
Response
This application has been withdrawn.
Please provide copies of all correspondence between HBC and the applicant/applicant agents for this application (FA/19/00564).
NOTICE OF REFUSAL
Your request to receive copies of all correspondence between HBC and the applicant/applicant agents for this application (FA/19/00564) is being refused under Exception 12(4)(b) Manifestly Unreasonable on the grounds that the request is vexatious.
The application FA/19/00564 - Retention of chicken coop, shepherds hut and storage shed at Little Warren Cottage has been withdrawn therefore it has been questioned as to why this information has been requested and what relevance it will have if disclosed.
In practice there is no material difference between a request that is vexatious under Section 14(1) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and a request that is manifestly unreasonable on vexatious grounds under the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
To define a request that is vexatious public authorities should consider the following questions taking into account the history of the request.
1. Can the request be seen as obsessive2. Is the request harassing the authority or causing distress to staff3. Would complying with the request impose a significant burden in terms of expense and distraction4. Is the request designed to cause disruption and annoyance5. Does the request lack any serious purpose or valueIn considering these questions the council would comment as follows:
1. a) The application has been withdrawn the release of the information has no relevance b) publication of images of private property2. The constant stream of requests, internal reviews and queries has caused immense distress to staff over many years3. Hastings Borough Council has spent a huge amount over the years dealing with request/refusals and internal reviews which has cost the council a significant amount of money in officer time4. At the 2015 SEG AGM along with comments made on Facebook, it is clear that SEG want to cause annoyance and disruption to Hastings Borough Council5. It is felt that this request is only relevant to a handful of individuals at most and has no serious purpose or value other than your ownException 12(4)(b) is subject to a public interest test. This means that a public authority can refuse to disclose information under these exceptions if in all the circumstances of the case the public interest in maintaining the exception outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
Factors for disclosure:
a. Transparency and accountabilityFactors against disclosure:
The public interest in maintaining this exception lies in protecting public authorities from exposure to:
a. Disproportionate burden.b. Unjustified level of distressc. Disruption in the handling of other information requestsFor the reasons given above we will not be communicating to you the information you have requested.
-
Freedom of Information
Contact
Contact us if you have a question about freedom of information.
Content
The content on this page is the responsibility of our Council's Information Officer.