FOI request (FOIR-610398872)

Spend on Office Supplies

Requested Tue 30 April 2024
Responded  Wed 29 May 2024

The details I require are:

1. Spend on Office supplies and associated products for the below financial years.

a. 2022/23

b. 2023/24

2. Start date and duration of Contract.

3. Is there an extension clause in the contract and, if so, the duration of the extension?

4. Has a decision been made yet on whether the contract is to be either extended or renewed?

5. Who is the senior officer (outside of procurement) responsible for the contract?

6. Name of incumbent supplier.

7. How long have you traded with them?

8. If you publish your register of contracts and purchasing, can you please provide a website link?

9. In addition, can you confirm if you have a contract in place for Tail End Spend?

Response

1a. £5,470.87

1b. £5,247.45

2. 1st January 2024 - 1 year

3. One year with a 12 month extension at the discretion of the customer.

4. Information not held.

5. Verna Connolly

6. Refused - please see below.

7. 2 years

8. https://in-tendhost.co.uk/Wealden/aspx/ViewContractsRegister.aspx?id=0193ec99-37ee-4eb0-ae93-68067f23fd95

9. Information not held.

NOTICE OF REFUSAL

The information you have requested in respect of the supplier is commercially sensitive and falls under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act - Commercially Sensitive Information - Information prejudicing commercial interests - commercial interest relating to an organisations commercial activity and may include trading activity procurement and relationships with third parties.

The exemption afforded by Section 43 is subject to what is known as the 'public interest test'. When applying the test in a particular case a public authority is deciding whether the public interest is better served by non-disclosure than by disclosure.

Although the Freedom of Information Act does not define 'in the public interest', there is a presumption under Freedom of Information that openness is in the public interest. In applying the public interest test a public authority will take into account the distinction that has been often made by courts between things that are in the public interest, and things that merely interest the public. Where applicants have not identified public interest considerations succinctly or accurately, the public authority has a responsibility under the Act to make their own assessment of the public interest considerations in the particular case.

We have identified the following public interest factors that may be seen as encouraging the disclosure of information:

a) accountability of public spending.

We consider these factors to be of limited relevance in relation to the information in question.

Public interest factors seen as encouraging non-disclosure are, generally, the exemptions themselves. In consideration of this matter we came to the following conclusions:

a) ensuring that companies are able to compete for business fairly.

b) damage to reputation and/or financial interests.

In weighing the factors for and against disclosure we have concluded that the likely benefit to the applicant and the wider public of disclosure is outweighed by the likely prejudice caused by such disclosure and that therefore the public interest is better served by non-disclosure.

For the reasons given above we will not be communicating to you the information you have requested.