FOI request (FOIR-597878661)

Social Media Management Platforms and Tools

Requested Wed 20 March 2024
Responded  Wed 27 March 2024

1. Do you use a Social Media Management platform?

2. If so, what tools do you use?

3. What is your annual spend on a Social Media Management tool?

4. What dates does your contract with your current supplier end (month and year)?

5. Do you use a tool for Social Listening and/or a Media Monitoring platform?

6. If so, what tools do you use?

7. What is your annual spend on a tool for Social Listening and/or a Media Monitoring platform?

8. What dates does your contract with your current supplier end (month and year)?

9. Who is the senior person responsible for managing these contracts?

Response

1. Yes.

2. Refused, please see the refusal notice below.

3. Refused, please see the refusal notice below.

4. January 2025.

5. Yes, Social Listening.

6. This is part of our current contract.

7. Refused, please see the refusal notice below.

8. As above.

9. Natasha Tewkesbury, Head of Community and Regulatory Services, Email: ntewkebury@hastings.gov.uk

NOTICE OF REFUSAL

The information you have requested in relation to Questions 3, 4, and 7 is commercially sensitive and falls under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act - Commercially Sensitive Information - Information prejudicing commercial interests - commercial interest relating to an organisation's commercial activity and may include trading activity procurement and relationships with third parties.

The exemption afforded by Section 43 is subject to what is known as the 'public interest test'. When applying the test in a particular case a public authority is deciding whether the public interest is better served by non-disclosure than by disclosure.

Although the Freedom of Information Act does not define 'in the public interest', there is a presumption under Freedom of Information that openness is in the public interest. In applying the public interest test a public authority will take into account the distinction that has been often made by courts between things that are in the public interest, and things that merely interest the public. Where applicants have not identified public interest considerations succinctly or accurately, the public authority has a responsibility under the Act to make their own assessment of the public interest considerations in the particular case.

We have identified the following public interest factors that may be seen as encouraging the disclosure of information:

a) accountability of public spending.

We consider these factors to be of limited relevance in relation to the information in question.

Public interest factors seen as encouraging non-disclosure are, generally, the exemptions themselves. In consideration of this matter we came to the following conclusions:

a) ensuring that companies are able to compete for business fairly.

b) damage to reputation and/or financial interests.

In weighing the factors for and against disclosure we have concluded that the likely benefit to the applicant and the wider public of disclosure is outweighed by the likely prejudice caused by such disclosure and that therefore the public interest is better served by non-disclosure.

For the reasons given above we will not be communicating to you the information you have requested.