FOI request (FOIR-566832635)

Artwork

Requested Mon 04 December 2023
Responded Mon 15 January 2024

Please provide the following information:

1. How many artworks have been purchased by the local authority in 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23?

2. How many artworks are in the possession of the local authority?

3. What is the estimated value of the artworks?

4. How many artworks are on public display?

Public display includes those that can be viewed by the members of the public in local authority buildings such as council headquarters, libraries, sports and leisure centres, and schools that are under local authority control. It would exclude areas of council properties that cannot be readily entered into by members of the public (such as, the office of the head of paid service).

Artwork includes, but is not limited to, paintings, photographs, sculptures, and electronic art.

Response

Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding.

1. How many artworks have been purchased by the local authority in 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23?

2020-21 - Zero

2021-22 - Zero

2022-23 - 1x Artwork purchased. The money was donated by a charity.

2. How many artworks are in the possession of the local authority?

Refused, please see below.

3. What is the estimated value of the artworks?

Refused, please see below.

4. How many artworks are on public display?

Refused, please see below.

Notice of Refusal

Please note that I consider the information you have requested in relation to (2), (3), and (4) to be exempt information under S31(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act in that disclosure of that information would be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime.

The exemption afforded by S31(1)(a) is subject to what is known as the 'public interest test'. When applying the test in a particular case a public authority is deciding whether the public interest is better served by non-disclosure than by disclosure.

Although the Freedom of Information Act does not define 'in the public interest', there is a presumption under Freedom of Information that openness is in the public interest. In applying the public interest test a public authority will take into account the distinction that has been often made by courts between things that are in the public interest, and things that merely interest the public. Where applicants have not identified public interest considerations succinctly or accurately, the public authority has a responsibility under the Act to make their own assessment of the public interest considerations in the particular case.

We have identified the following public interest factors that may be seen as encouraging the disclosure of information:

a) furtherance of understanding and participation in the public debate of issues of the day.

b) promotion of accountability and transparency by public authorities in the decision they make and the spending of public money.

c) allowing individuals and companies to better understand decisions made by public authorities which affect their lives.

We consider these factors to be generally of limited or no relevance in relation to the information in question.

Public interest factors seen as encouraging non-disclosure are, generally, the exemptions themselves. In consideration of this matter we came to the following conclusions:

a) that there is no evidence of a wider public (rather than individual) interest in disclosure.

b) that the disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the prevention or detection of crime.

c) that the nature of such prejudice is real and substantial and that there is a real and significant risk of such prejudice.

d. that crime associated with valuable works of art whether owned by organisations, has a substantial detrimental effect upon other individuals in the neighbourhood and wider community.

e) that the motives behind the request (albeit not provided to us) have no relevance since disclosure would mean the information would be in the public domain.

In weighing the factors for and against disclosure we have concluded that the likely benefit to the applicant and the wider public of disclosure is outweighed by the likely prejudice caused by such disclosure and that therefore the public interest is better served by non-disclosure.