Requests and responses by category
Cabinet Meeting on 3rd September 2018
Requested Mon 17 December 2018
Responded Fri 25 January 2019
I refer to the Minutes of the Council Cabinet Meeting on 3rd September 2018, Under Freedom of Information legislation I should be grateful if you could provide me with copies of or other access to e.g. on-line
The '....reports and investigations to de-risk the site ....' which are referred to as background documentation in the reasons for recommendation;
A copy of the agreed layout and development mix submitted by County Gate/Sunley which formed the basis for Members' decision to accept their successful bid. I do not require access to other confidential contractual and financial information which I note is still the subject of ongoing negotiation.
NOTICE OF REFUSAL
The information you have requested is commercially sensitive and falls under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act - Commercially Sensitive Information.
Information prejudicing commercial interests - commercial interest relating to an organisations commercial activity and may include trading activity procurement and relationships with third parties.
The exemption afforded by Section 43 is subject to what is known as the 'public interest test'. When applying the test in a particular case a public authority is deciding whether the public interest is better served by non-disclosure than by disclosure.
Although the Freedom of Information Act does not define 'in the public interest', there is a presumption under Freedom of Information that openness is in the public interest. In applying the public interest test a public authority will take into account the distinction that has been often made by courts between things that are in the public interest, and things that merely interest the public. Where applicants have not identified public interest considerations succinctly or accurately, the public authority has a responsibility under the Act to make their own assessment of the public interest considerations in the particular case.
We have identified the following public interest factors that may be seen as encouraging the disclosure of information:
a) accountability of public spending
We consider these factors to be of limited relevance in relation to the information in question.
Public interest factors seen as encouraging non-disclosure are, generally, the exemptions themselves. In consideration of this matter we came to the following conclusions:
a) ensuring that companies are able to compete for business fairly
b) Negotiations are still on-going
c) damage to reputation , commercial operations and financial interests
In weighing the factors for and against disclosure we have concluded that the likely benefit to the applicant and the wider public of disclosure is outweighed by the likely prejudice caused by such disclosure and that therefore the public interest is better served by non-disclosure.
For the reasons given above we will not be communicating to you the information you have requested.
Freedom of Information